Search for: All records

Species loss in fragile insular communities can alter the composition and stability of local assemblages. Climate change or anthropogenic pressures are sometimes attributed to the loss of Caribbean bats, but other factors are elusive to document. We studied time-scaled changes in bat assemblage composition from a palaeontological excavation in Cueva Matos, Puerto Rico. Over 800 individual fossils were identified to species, and charcoal was used to develop an AMS¹⁴C chronology. Although three bat species live in the cave today, fossils comprise 10 species. These included five extirpated species from the cave and three no longer present on the island. Losses centred around 2460–4470 kya. Notably, we document the first record ofMormoops megalophyllaas extirpated from Puerto Rico. Nearly 90% of the extirpated bats in Cueva Matos prefer to roost in hot caves where temperatures may reach 40℃. However, these temperatures are currently not held in any cave chamber. Our findings suggest that structural changes in the cave resulted in the loss of heat traps and likely led to a sudden shift in the bat assemblage composition at this cave, which is now void of hot cave specialist bats. 

Abstract Weasels (genusMustelaandNeogale) are of management concern as declining native species in some regions and invasive species in others. Regardless of the need to conserve or remove weasels, there is increasingly a need to use non‐invasive monitoring methods to assess population trends.We conducted a literature review and held the first ever International Weasel Monitoring Symposium to synthesise information on historical and current non‐invasive monitoring techniques for weasels. We also explored current limitations, opportunities, and areas of development to guide future research and long‐term monitoring.Our literature search revealed that in the past 20 years, camera traps were the most commonly used non‐invasive monitoring method (62% of studies), followed by track plates or scent stations designed to collect footprints (23%) and walking transects for tracks in snow or soil (8.7%).Experts agreed that the most promising non‐invasive monitoring techniques available include use of citizen scientist reporting, detection dogs, detecting tracks, non‐invasive genetic surveys, and enclosed or unenclosed camera trap systems. Because each technique has benefits and limitations, using a multi‐method approach is likely required.There is a need for strong commitment to dedicated monitoring that is replicated over space and time such that trend data can be ascertained to better inform future management action. The diversity of non‐invasive monitoring methods now available makes such monitoring possible with relatively minor commitments of funding and effort.